Our Expertise
We take great pride in the high calibre of our work and we take great joy being instrumental to our clients’ success.
Employment Law
Our firm is committed to working with progressive employers who seek to make the workplace better for employees, and with employees who have suffered serious wrongs because of illegal employment practices.
We cherish the opportunity to ensure workplace fairness by helping employers and employees comply with employment law and provide immeasurable, positive benefits to both workers and employers.
When things go wrong, you need an experienced lawyer to assist with disciplinary, harassment issues, and personal grievances, etc. We help resolve disputes through mediation, other forms of dispute resolution and authority representation.
A recent example of our work in the Employment Law litigation is Urban Décor v Yu and Xia [2022] NZEmpC 56. In 2020, we acted for an employer in the Employment Relations Authority. The employees said they had quit, but were nevertheless issued with termination notice. The employees sued and claimed that they were unjustifiably dismissed.
The ERA agreed with us and as a matter of factual finding, the employees did said they quit, but the ERA was of the view that case law suggests that in such circumstance the employer should give the employee a chance to cool down and cannot assume that the employee has actually resigned.
On behalf of the employer, we challenged this decision, on the points of law, in the Employment Court. The Employment Court agreed with us and found that “whether or not an employee has resigned is an objective test as to whether a reasonable employer, with knowledge of the surrounding circumstances, would have reasonably considered the employee to have resigned. Clear words of resignation are likely to clear that bar unless a different understanding can be informed by the surrounding circumstances.”
In this challenge, the employees also argued that if they were not dismissed by the termination notice then they were constructively dismissed. We successfully argued that the necessary factual findings which the employees rely on for this claim were not made by the Employment Relations Authority, and since this is a point of law challenge and the employees specifically chose not to do a de novo cross challenge, it is not open for them to run this claim. The employer was successful in its challenge.
We advise employer clients on matters such as –
- Terms and effects of employment agreement. You may need to tailor your employment agreement to suit your business needs and avoid terms which may show on standard template that does not align with your business interest or practice.
- Statutory requirements. Clients sometimes need advice on what the law requires of them, and what they need to do to be legally compliant. We can provide advice taking into consideration of your particular circumstances.
- Redundancy. Any sector has its good days and bad days. In the bad days you will simply need to cut down on your operation and expenses. Letting people go due to surplus to requirement can be a pitfall. There are relatively strict requirements of what the employer has to do in order to make employee redundant. A mistake in the process could result in an unjustifiable dismissal claim and can be very costly.
- Disciplinary process and dismissal. Just because someone is not performing well does not mean that person can be dismissed easily. There are statutory and contractual requirements in how to conduct a Disciplinary process and leading to dismissal.
We advise employee clients on matters such as –
- Unjustifiable dismissal. For example:
- where dismissal for disciplinary matters did not follow the correct legal procedure;
- where dismissal was motivated by disciplinary issues, but made under the guise of redundancy; or
- where the employer has made the work environment impossible for the employee to continue to work and forced the employee to resign. This is call constructive dismissal.
- Wage arrears.
- Employment premium – where the employer charged the employee money to give them the job.
- Unjustifiable disadvantage, such as not providing employee with day off on statutory holiday and no day off in lieu.
Our Employment Law Team
Daniel Zhang
DIRECTOR
09 905 3687
dzhang@adventark.co.nz
Ezra Tie
LAWYER
etie@adventark.co.nz
LULU WANG
LAWYER
09 905 4653
lwang@adventark.co.nz
Timothy Omamalin
LAW CLERK
tomamalin@adventark.co.nz